Playing with Shadows: Reinjection Loops and Historical Allusion in Georg Friedrich Haas’s Live Electronic Music
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent scholarship suggests that the music of Austrian composer Georg Friedrich Haas can be understood as a dramatic confrontation between “clashing harmonic systems” (Hasegawa, 2015). Building on this observation, the present article focuses on Haas’s recent endeavors in the genre of live electronic music, showing how the composer deploys a relatively straightforward technical procedure—the reinjection loop, or the delayed playback of recorded sound at various speeds—to juxtapose different modes of pitch organization, including twelve-tone equal temperament, ultrachromatic microtonality, and just intonation. After surveying the composer’s relationship to these historical idioms, the article presents detailed analyses of two pieces ( Ein Schattenspiel and String Quartet No. 4) to illustrate how the reinjection loop operates at multiple registers simultaneously, bringing the performers into contact with their immediate past, while also bringing Haas into dialogue with the shadows of his own compositional predecessors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".