Perceptions and Practices of Providing Physical Activity Counselling and Exercise Prescriptions among Physiotherapists in Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the perceptions and practices of physical activity counselling and exercise prescription of physiotherapists in Nova Scotia. Method: A total of 146 physiotherapists in Nova Scotia completed an online self-reflection survey regarding their current practice of, confidence in, barriers to, and facilitators of providing physical activity and exercise (PAE) counselling to their patients. Results: Physiotherapists included physical activity counselling and exercise content in 85% of patient counselling appointments. They reported a high level of confidence (> 90%) in providing PAE information and answering patients’ PAE questions and moderate confidence in their patients’ abilities to maintain PAE over the long term (73%) and to follow through on their PAE recommendations (66%). Patients’ interest in PAE was the greatest barrier to providing PAE counselling. The physiotherapists reported being most comfortable when prescribing exercise for patients with musculoskeletal conditions and least comfortable with patients with cancer, insulin-dependent diabetes, and respiratory conditions. Most physiotherapists (71%) reported being interested in pursuing further education or training in PAE counselling and prescription. Conclusions: The physiotherapists frequently recommended PAE to their patients, had moderate confidence in their patients’ ability to follow through on their advice, and experienced patients’ disinterest in PAE as the greatest barrier to providing PAE counselling. The results of this study suggest a desire by physiotherapists for educational training opportunities, which we recommend be focused on providing behavioural strategies and further information to help overcome patient-focused barriers; this will help patients adopt and maintain physically active lifestyles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".