MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mourning, Melancholia, <i>Moonlight</i>

2019· article· en· W2971069185 on OpenAlex
John Paul Ricco

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCR The New Centennial Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentennialIconCitationArt historyMoonlightMedia studiesArtHistoryLibrary scienceSociologyComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| July 01 2019 Mourning, Melancholia, Moonlight John Paul Ricco John Paul Ricco University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada John Paul Ricco is Professor of Comparative Literature, Art History, and Visual Culture at the University of Toronto. He is the author of The Logic of the Lure (University of Chicago Press, 2003) and The Decision between Us: Art and Ethics in the Time of Scenes (University of Chicago Press, 2014). Recent articles include “The Commerce of Anonymity” in Qui Parle and chapters in the collections Nancy and the Political (Edinburgh University Press, 2015); Porn Archives (Duke University Press, 2014); and W. J. T. Mitchell’s Image Theory (Routledge, 2016). He is currently completing a monograph titled The Intimacy of the Outside, Not Beyond, of which his writing on Moonlight will be a part. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google CR: The New Centennial Review (2019) 19 (2): 21–46. https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.2.0021 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation John Paul Ricco; Mourning, Melancholia, Moonlight. CR: The New Centennial Review 1 July 2019; 19 (2): 21–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.19.2.0021 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressCR: The New Centennial Review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © Michigan State University Board of Trustees Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it