MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971183221 · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2019.08.014

CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials for traditional Chinese medicine (CENT for TCM) : Recommendations, explanation and elaboration

2019· article· en· W2971183221 on OpenAlexaff
Li Jiang, Jiayuan Hu, Jingbo Zhai, Junqiang Niu, Joey SW Kwong, Long Ge, Bo Li, Qi Wang, Xiaoqin Wang, Dang Wei, Jinhui Tian, Bin Ma, Kehu Yang, Min Dai, Hongcai Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueComplementary Therapies in Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineChecklistConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsAlternative medicinePsychological interventionTraditional Chinese medicineDelphi methodClinical trialQuality (philosophy)Traditional medicineFamily medicineNursingPsychologyPathologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.350
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.705
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3500.705
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.041
Bibliometrics0.0130.013
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0210.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.382
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.075 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueComplementary Therapies in MedicineSame topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207