Relationship Between Spatio-Temporal Leaf Area Index and Crop Coefficient When Monitoring Coffee Plots in Brazil Using the Sentine-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robust monitoring techniques for perennial crops have become increasingly possible due to technological advances in the area of Remote Sensing (RS), and the products are available through the European Space Agency (ESA) initiative. RS data provides valuable opportunities for detailed assessments of crop conditions at plot level using high spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution. This study addresses the monitoring of coffee at the plot level using RS, analyzing the relationship between the spatio-temporal variability of the Leaf Area Index (LAI) and the crop coefficient (Kc); the Kc being a biophysical variable that integrates the potential hydrological characteristics of an agroecosystem compared to the reference crop. Daily and one-year Kc were estimated using the relation of crop evapotranspiration and reference. ESA Sentinel-2 images were pre-analyzed and atmospherically corrected, and Top-of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) reflections converted to Top-of-the-Canopy (TOC) reflectance. The TOCs resampled at the 10m resolution, and with the angles corresponding to the directional information at the time of the acquisition, the LAI was estimated using the trained neural network available in the Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP). During 75% of the monitored days, Kc ranged between 1.2 and 1.3 and, the LAI analyzed showed high spatial and temporal variability at the plot level. Based on the relationship between the biophysical variables, the LAI variable can substitute the Kc and be used to monitor the water conditions at the production area as well as analyze spatial variability inside that area. Sentinel-2 products could be more useful in monitoring coffee in the farm production area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".