MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971326602 · doi:10.1093/arclin/acz034.84

B-01 Cognitive Deficits Following Hemorrhagic Stroke in Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Case Study

2019· article· en· W2971326602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Schultz, Samantha DeDios-Stern, Gabriel P. Ovsiew, Neil H. Pliskin

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological Complications and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)NeuropsychologyPsychologyReversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromeNeuropsychological assessmentAudiologyCognitionMedicineCardiologyCerebral arteriesNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), a relatively rare condition presenting as severe thunderclap headache with or without neurological deficits, is characterized by vasoconstriction of cerebral arteries which often resolves within three months and may be associated with stroke. Previous case reports examining neuropsychological profiles of RCVS patients demonstrated stroke-specific and/or diffuse global impairments that often exceed impairment expected post-acute phase of clinical stroke and possibly suggest residual deficits related to RCVS alone (Perdices & Herkes, 2018). Method The present case is a 36-year-old right-handed African-American male who sustained a left thalamic hemorrhage with extension into the ventricular system following marijuana use. Cerebral angiogram was suggestive of RCVS. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status- Update (RBANS), and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Teat- 4th edition (PPVT-4) were administered at bedside. Results Neuropsychological testing was abnormal with severe global impairments on tasks requiring attention and processing speed, visuospatial abilities, immediate and delayed memory, and executive functioning. The patient’s expressive speech was characterized by fluent output with pronounced provoked and unprovoked phonemic and semantic paraphasias. Additionally, he evidenced confabulatory responses during memory testing and lost mental set during tasks requiring simultaneous attention. Conclusions Considering the patients clear sensorium at the time of the evaluation, these deficits extend beyond what would be expected by a single thalamic lesion and implicate more generalized cerebral dysfunction secondary to his RCVS. Consistent with previous case studies, this case demonstrates how RCVS may confound and contribute to neurocognitive deficits even after hemorrhagic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Clinical NeuropsychologySame topicNeurological Complications and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207