Computational Insight into the Differential Mutagenic Patterns of O-Methylthymine Lesions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential mutagenic patterns were recently reported for O-methylated thymine lesions, which indicate that O4-methylthymine (O4-Me-T) frequently leads to G misinsertions, whereas O2-methylthymine (O2-Me-T) is primarily nonmutagenic. The reasons for these differences are unclear since both lesions similarly alter the Watson–Crick binding face of T. To rationalize these replication outcomes at a molecular level, this work uses density functional theory calculations and molecular dynamics simulations to probe the lesion base-pairing properties as well as lesion accommodation by human polymerase η (pol η) and post-extension DNA duplexes. O4-Me-T forms two strong hydrogen bonds with an opposing G in the active site of pol η, which rationalizes the observed lesion mutagenicity. Nevertheless, dATP insertion opposite O4-Me-T can proceed through water-mediated hydrogen bonding, which is similar to the pathway previously proposed for pol η bypass of abasic sites and other T alkylation lesions. In contrast, the position of O2-Me-T in the pol η active site is dynamic due to the presence of the aberrant methyl group on the minor groove side of DNA. In fact, the experimental replication outcomes can only be rationalized when the syn glycosidic orientation of O2-Me-T is considered, which stabilizes the pre-insertion complex by placing the damage in the polymerase open pocket on the major groove side of DNA. Although dATP insertion can occur opposite syn-O2-Me-T through a water-mediated pathway similar to O4-Me-T replication, rotation about the glycosidic bond precludes a stable pol η ternary complex corresponding to dGTP insertion, which correlates with the reported nonmutagenic bypass of O2-Me-T. In addition to providing structural insights into the differential mutagenicity of methylated T adducts, our data highlight an emerging theme in the literature for the replication of pyrimidine alkylation products in noncanonical glycosidic orientations and sets the stage for future work on the replication of other alkylated lesions by TLS polymerases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".