MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971361494 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2939145

Crowd Sensing in Vehicular Networks Using Uncertain Mobility Information

2019· article· en· W2971361494 on OpenAlexaff
Waleed Alasmary, Shahrokh Valaee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMobility modelCorrectnessBottleneckScheduling (production processes)Channel (broadcasting)Real-time computingNoise (video)Distributed computingComputer networkMathematical optimizationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we quantify the impact of uncertainty in predicted mobility information on the sensing cost of the mobile sensing problem (i.e. sensing of target areas) in vehicular sensor networks. We focus on vehicular sensor networks in which the communication channel is the bottleneck of the system, and sensing the environment is meant to be provided with a minimum load on the communication channel. First, we formulate an opportunistic scheduler, which does not utilize predicted mobility information in the sensing procedure. Then, we formulate a strategic scheduler, which utilizes predicted mobility information in the sensing procedure. After that, we propose two types of noise models that capture the uncertainty in knowing mobility information. We quantify the impact of uncertainty in knowing mobility information on the sensing cost of the strategic scheduler using an independent coverage model. We find that the strategic scheduler outperforms the noise-free opportunistic scheduler even when the strategic scheduler utilizes noisy mobility information up to a certain threshold of noise. This threshold is determined in the paper, and is referred to as the breaking point of the strategic scheduler. Simulation results of the breaking point closely matches our analysis, which demonstrates the correctness of the used analysis methodology. Finally, we use an estimation model for the mobility information between two points on the road, and we propose an algorithm to keep the scheduling scheme below the breaking point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingFrench-language works237,207