MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971389142 · doi:10.1096/fba.2019-00039

Activity of lumacaftor is not conserved in zebrafish Cftr bearing the major cystic fibrosis‐causing mutation

2019· article· en· W2971389142 on OpenAlexafffund
Onofrio Laselva, Steven Erwood, Kai Du, Christine E. Bear

Bibliographic record

VenueFASEB BioAdvances · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCystic Fibrosis Canada
KeywordsCystic fibrosisZebrafishMutationCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorChild bearingBiologyMedicineBioinformaticsGeneticsGenePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract F508del‐cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is the major mutant responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF). ORKAMBI ® , approved for patients bearing this mutant, contains lumacaftor (VX‐809) that partially corrects F508del‐CFTR's processing defect and ivacaftor (VX‐770) that potentiates its defective channel activity. Unfortunately, the clinical efficacy of ORKAMBI ® is modest, highlighting the need to understand how the small molecules work so that superior compounds can be developed. Because, human CFTR (hCFTR) and zebrafish Cftr (zCftr) are structurally conserved as determined in recent cryo‐EM structural models, we hypothesized that the consequences of the major mutation and small molecule modulators would be similar for the two species of protein. As expected, like the F508del mutation in hCFTR, the homologous mutation in zCftr (F507del) is misprocessed, yet not as severely as the human mutant and this defect was restored by low‐temperature (27°C) culture conditions. After rescue to the cell surface, F507del‐zCftr exhibited regulated channel activity that was potentiated by ivacaftor. Surprisingly, lumacaftor failed to rescue misprocessing of the F507del‐zCftr at either 37 or 27°C suggesting that future comparative studies with F508del‐hCFTR would provide insight into its structure: function relationships. Interestingly, the robust rescue of F508del‐zCftr at 27°C and availability of methods for in vivo screening in zebrafish present the opportunity to define the cellular pathways underlying rescue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFASEB BioAdvancesSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207