THE PRINCIPLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW FOR MOST FAVOURED NATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHALE HYDROCARBON AND COAL BED METHANE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New energy sources in the future such as Shale Hydrocarbon and Coal Bed Methane are very potential in Indonesia. International companies of natural gas and oil such as United States and Canada have been considering themselves to do investment in this sector since 2005. A global challenge such as oil price deflation in 2017 and 2018 decreases investment value of Indonesia natural gas and oil. It expects that strategies of policy and planning of domestic/foreign investors may invest their assets in Indonesia gas and oil and find many new opportunities such as production development of non-conventional natural gas and oil (i.e., MGNK) by prioritizing the principle of equal treatment without any racial discrimination on its origin based on Article 3 subsection (1) of Act No. 25/ 2007 about Capital Investment and Ministerial Decree of Energy and Mineral Source No. 26/ 2017 about the Mechanism of Investment Return on Oild-and-Gas Upstream Business Activities to provide legal assurance in investment climate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".