MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971566734 · doi:10.1002/pssr.201900443

Alternating Current‐Driven Oxide Powder Electroluminescent Device Employing Vertically Aligned ZnO Nanowire Array

2019· article· en· W2971566734 on OpenAlexafffund
Siwei Ma, Sirui Tan, Adrian H. Kitai

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhosphorElectroluminescenceNanowireOptoelectronicsAnnealing (glass)OxideHydrothermal circulationZincNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)Chemical engineeringComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel type of AC‐driven oxide powder electroluminescent (EL) device is demonstrated. The device is based on stable heterogeneous junctions between Mn 2+ ‐activated zinc germanate (Zn 2 GeO 4 :Mn) oxide phosphor and a vertically aligned ZnO nanowire array. The ZnO nanowire array is synthesized on an ITO‐coated glass substrate via a hydrothermal growth method. A stable phosphor–nanowire junction is formed by simple drop‐coating of a Zn 2 GeO 4 :Mn oxide phosphor suspension on the nanowire layer followed by annealing at 400 °C for 3 h. Bright green light (≈20 cd m −2 ) with a wavelength of 535 nm from the as‐fabricated EL device is observed, and the as‐fabricated device shows excellent stability in air, maintaining a brightness of ≈10 cd m −2 for 15 days with less than 2.5% intensity loss. The electroluminescence emission mechanism is discussed in detail. This new and facile strategy to build an oxide powder EL device can enable cost‐effective, highly stable, and energy‐efficient devices for lighting or display applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research LettersSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207