MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971614217 · doi:10.11575/prism/36938

Impacts of calving management, calf risk factors, and difficult calvings on health and performance of beef calves

2019· dissertation· en· W2971614217 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Jennifer M. Pearson

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Agriculture and Forestry
KeywordsIce calvingAnimal scienceBeef cattleBiologyNull (SQL)BiotechnologyAgricultural sciencePregnancyComputer scienceLactationGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calf health and survival is crucial to successful cow-calf operations. Assisted calves are at a disadvantage compared to their herdmates because they may be injured, oxygen deprived, or less vigorous at birth. Determining evidence-based management practices to mitigate the effects of calving assistance on calf health and survival, as well as investigating risk factors associated with assisted calvings that affect transfer of passive immunity (TPI), morbidity, mortality, and growth, will help improve calf wellbeing. Therefore, the objectives of this thesis were to: benchmark the incidence of calving assistance and health outcomes, and describe current calving and colostrum management practices; to determine the impacts of subclinical trauma on calf vigour and TPI; and to investigate the impact of implementing pain mitigation at birth to assisted beef calves. Chapter 2 described current calving and colostrum management practices found on western Canadian cow-calf operations. Although the incidence of assisted calvings was low, the majority of producers assisted at least one calving, indicating the importance of understanding intervention and management strategies in compromised calves such as those assisted at birth. Chapter 3 quantified subclinical trauma associated with the degree of calving difficulty, and evaluated associations between subclinical trauma and calf vigour and TPI. Calves experiencing difficult births had elevated levels of subclinical trauma and decreased vigour. Subclinical trauma and reduced vigour were also associated with inadequate TPI. Chapters 4 and 5 investigated the clinical impacts of administering a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug to assisted beef calves at birth. In Chapter 4, calves administered meloxicam had greater average daily gain in the first week of life compared to placebo treated calves, but no effect was seen on pain and inflammatory mediators, vigour, TPI, health, or weaning growth. In Chapter 5, there was no effect of administering meloxicam to assisted calves on TPI, health, or growth, but vigour assessment and colostrum management were found to be important management tools associated with TPI, calf health, and growth. Therefore, calves assisted at birth experience subclinical trauma that affects their vigour and TPI. Pain mitigation strategies, vigour assessment, and colostrum management may be important tools to improve wellbeing in assisted beef calves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207