MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971635710 · doi:10.1037/cpp0000301

ABCs of SLEEPING Tool: Improving Access to Care for Pediatric Insomnia

2019· article· en· W2971635710 on OpenAlex
Melissa Howlett, Amanda Adams, Penny Corkum

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsInsomniaMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Pediatric insomnia is common among children; however, access to evidence-based treatment is limited. The ABCs of SLEEPING tool was developed to facilitate assessment of children’s sleep habits and provide evidence-based recommendations. The title serves as a mnemonic device that captures practice areas known to be foundational to healthy sleep: A ge-appropriate B edtimes and wake-times with C onsistency, S chedules and routines, L ocation, E xercise and diet, no E lectronics in bedroom or before bed, P ositivity, I ndependence, and N eeds met, equal G reat sleep. The tool includes an online questionnaire for parents, followed by electronic feedback highlighting problem areas and handouts including evidence-based recommendations. The current study assesses the usability of the ABCs of SLEEPING tool. Method: Twenty-two parents used the ABCs of SLEEPING tool, then provided feedback. Eight health care providers also reviewed the tool and provided feedback. Results: The ABCs of SLEEPING tool was rated as highly usable, desirable, accessible, and credible. Participants noted that minor modifications, such as prioritizing and customizing recommendations, may enhance the usefulness and valuableness. Participant feedback will be incorporated into a modified version. Conclusion: The ABCs of SLEEPING tool has the potential to address the need for a comprehensive and accessible resource for parents and to support health care providers in assessing and treating pediatric insomnia, and thus improving access to care. Implications for Impact Statement This study describes the development and usability testing of a tool designed to increase access to information and resources focused on healthy sleep practices for children. Feedback from parents and health care providers suggest that the ABCs of SLEEPING tool has the potential to support initial assessment and intervention of childhood behavioral sleep problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.536
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it