Synthesis, molecular packing and anti-cholinesterase activity of some new C-2 N-substituted anthranilamide derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Synthesis of C-2 N-substituted anthranilamide derivatives was carried out in a straight forward manner, utilizing 2-aminobenzamide and benzyl chloride as starting materials. Their crystal structures have been established by single crystal X-ray crystallographic method. In the molecules of 2-benzylamino-benzamide (3a), intramolecular hydrogen bonding b/w O atom and proton of –NH and classical intermolecular hydrogen bonding of the type N–H · · · O forming eight membered rings in R4 2(8) pattern. In both molecules of 2-(dibenzylamino)benzamide (3b), unlike the molecule in 3a, each H atoms is pointed towards N atom causing intramolecular hydrogen bonding interactions, resulting in S(6) motifs. However, it is interesting to note that both molecules in 3b are lying about inversion centres and form dimers in R4 2(8) motifs; the two dimers are linked via non-classical intermolecular hydrogen bonds C–H · · · O resulting in clusters of four molecules in the structure. In vitro assay results revealed that molecule 3b with IC50 values of 3.8 ± 0.08 μM (AChE) and 17.6 ± 1.10 μM (BChE) possessed better cholinesterase (AChE and BChE) inhibition potential as compared to standard drug galantamine. Preliminary in silico studies showed that more biological active derivatives were also having good pharmacokinetic profile with no AMES toxicity and carcinogenicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".