MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971730989 · doi:10.1002/macp.201900234

Soluble Telechelic Polycondensation Poly(ether ketones): Synthesis and Characterization

2019· article· en· W2971730989 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelkader Benhalima, Alexandra Fürtös, Josée Brisson

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Chemistry and Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCondensation polymerPolymer chemistryEtherChemistryDifferential scanning calorimetryGel permeation chromatographyThermogravimetryCrystallizationPolymerReactivity (psychology)SolventOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present article reports the synthesis of soluble, propyl‐substituted aromatic ring telechelic polycondensation blocks having molecular weights ranging from 1800 to 6500 g mol−1and polymolecularities of 1.3 to 1.7. Chain‐growth polycondensation is performed, and the initiator is selected through reactivity studies, using19F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. Gel permeation chromatography, NMR spectroscopy, and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry show that blocks are terminated by a methoxy group at one end and a fluorine atom at the other. Polymers are crystalline as synthesized, as shown by X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry, do not recrystallize once melted, and undergo solvent‐induced crystallization. Crystalline peak positions and relative intensities are different from those observed for other poly(ether ketones). The difference in crystal form is proposed to stem from packing disruption related to the presence of propyl substituents. Thermogravimetry shows a good thermal resistance up to 450 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Chemistry and PhysicsSame topicSynthesis and properties of polymersFrench-language works237,207