MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971834725 · doi:10.1177/1460408619872593

Effect of a mindfulness intervention on patients admitted after multisystem trauma

2019· article· en· W2971834725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrauma · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMindfulnessAnxietyDepression (economics)Mental healthIntervention (counseling)NeurocognitiveAcute Stress DisorderClinical psychologyIncidence (geometry)PsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The incidence of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorders is reported to be as high as 50% in trauma patients. The perpetual negative emotions and state of mind in these disorders predisposes patients to negative mental health outcomes. Mindfulness, on the other hand, helps people to process their experience and emotions in a non-judgmental manner, and recently, there has been increased utilization of mindfulness-based therapies for the treatment of mental health conditions. This proof-of-concept study evaluates the use of a mindfulness-based online application in patients admitted to the trauma service at a Level 1 Trauma Centre. Methods Trauma patients who were English speaking, over the age of 18, and without brain injury or pre-existing neurocognitive disorder were included. Participants completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)-21 to assess level of depression, anxiety, and stress, and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) to assess level of resiliency. Then, after 28 consecutive days of practicing mindfulness using the app ‘Stop, Breathe, and Think,’ the questionnaires were repeated and an exit survey conducted. Results For this study, 13 participants were enrolled, 2 withdrew, and 5 were lost to follow-up. The mean DASS-21 score at time enrollment was 16.4 and was 11.2 at follow-up ( p = 0.10). There were no differences between the level of depression and stress from enrollment to follow-up, but there was significant decrease in anxiety symptoms from 7.2 to 3.0 (<0.05). CD-RISC scores at enrollment and follow-up were 77.8 and 81 ( p = 0.23), respectively. At the time of exit interview, 67% of patients continued to use the application three to four times a week and 67% responded they plan to continue using the application. In addition, 83% of patients always or often felt better after practicing mindfulness and stated they would recommend the application to others. Conclusions Mindfulness shows promising potential to decrease psychological distress in trauma patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it