Investigations of the formation of zeolite ZSM-39 (MTN)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crystallization of zeolite ZSM-39 (MTN), a clathrate and silicate analogue of the 17 Å cubic gas hydrate, was examined in a solvent system involving a tetramethylammonium chloride – 1,6-hexanediol deep eutectic mixture and significant amount of water. The crystallization process was followed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) techniques involving several nuclei such as 19F, 29Si, and 13C. The results indicate that the crystallization starts from the arrangement of amorphous Si–O–Si species around the tetramethylammonium ions and subsequent formation of the cages in the precursors similar to [51264] cages in the MTN topology. The larger [51264] cages are then connected via the smaller [512] cages containing the fluoride ions to form the final MTN structure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyses show that the crystal growth rates along <100> and <111> directions are roughly the same, suggesting that the (100) and (111) planes have similar stability under the crystallization conditions used. AFM study also shows that the freshly born nuclei on the (100) face are of a height of 2 nm, suggesting a layer by layer growth of the polyhedral crystal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".