Kajian Resiliensi pada Mahasiswa Bandung yang Mengalami Quarter Life Crisis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Young adulthood is a stage of human development. Entering the stage of adult development, many reactions occur in individuals. Some individuals feel happy and enthusiastic, but some are anxious and afraid because they feel they do not have enough stock or preparation. Forms of emotional crisis that occur in individuals at the stage of emerging adulthood, include feelings of helplessness, isolation, doubt about one's own abilities and fear of failure. This condition is known as the quarter life crisis (Atwood and Scholtz, 2008). Resilience is an important aspect for individuals to overcome, improve themselves in facing various difficulties, challenges they experience. The purpose of this study was to determine the resilience picture of Bandung students who experienced a quarter life crisis. The study was conducted with quantitative descriptive methods. Samples were taken using purposive sampling technique with a total sampling of 421 Bandung students. The study used a resilience scale instrument of 25 items. The results showed the level of resilience of Bandung students who experienced a quarter life crisis showed that some of the respondents namely 56 people (13%) were at a very low level, 57 people (13.5%) were at a low level, 92 people (21.9% ) are below the average level, 112 people (26.6%) at the average level, 87 people (20.7%) at the above average level. Very few respondents were 17 people (4%) at a high level. The conclusion from this study is that the resilience of Bandung students experiencing quarter life crisis is at an average resilience level. Keywords: Resilience, quarter of life crisis, emergence of adults, Students. Abstrak. Masa dewasa muda merupakan sebuat tahapan perkembangan manusia. Memasuki tahap perkembangan dewasa, banyak reaksi yang muncul pada diri individu. Sebagian individu merasa senang dan antusias, namun ada juga yang merasa cemas dan takut karena merasa tidak memiliki bekal atau persiapan yang cukup. Bentuk krisis emosional yang terjadi pada individu pada tahap emerging adulthood, mencakup perasaan tak berdaya, terisolasi, ragu akan kemampuan diri sendiri dan takut akan kegagalan. Kondisi ini dikenal dengan istilah quarter life crisis ( Atwood dan Scholtz, 2008).Resiliensi menjadi aspek penting bagi individu dalam mengatasi, meningkatkan diri dalam menghadapi berbagai kesulitan, tantangan yang dialaminya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui gambaran resiliensi mahasiswa Bandung yang mengalami quarter life crisis. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metoda deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel yang diambil menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan total sampling sebanyak 421 mahasiswa Bandung. Penelitian menggunakan instrumen resilience scale sebanyak 25 item. Hasil penelitian menunjukan tingkatan resiliensi mahasiswa Bandung yang mengalami quarter life crisis menunjukan bahwa sebagian dari responden yaitu 56 orang (13%) berada pada tingkat sangat rendah, 57 orang (13,5%) berada pada tingkat rendah, 92 orang (21,9%) berada pada tingkat dibawah rata-rata, 112 orang (26,6%) pada tingkat rata-rata, 87 orang (20,7%) pada tingkat diatas rata-rata. Sangat sedikit responden yaitu 17 orang (4%) pada tingkat tinggi. Simpulan dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa resiliensi mahasiswa Bandung yang mengalami quarter life crisis berada pada tingkat resiliensi rata-rata. Kata Kunci : Resiliensi, quarter life crisis, emerging adulthood, Mahasiswa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it