MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971918154 · doi:10.29313/.v0i0.17102

Kajian Resiliensi pada Mahasiswa Bandung yang Mengalami Quarter Life Crisis

2019· article· id· W2971918154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elgea Nur Balzarie, Endah Nawangsih

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Nonprobability samplingPsychologyFeelingLearned helplessnessPsychological resilienceSocial psychologyDemographyPopulationSociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Young adulthood is a stage of human development. Entering the stage of adult development, many reactions occur in individuals. Some individuals feel happy and enthusiastic, but some are anxious and afraid because they feel they do not have enough stock or preparation. Forms of emotional crisis that occur in individuals at the stage of emerging adulthood, include feelings of helplessness, isolation, doubt about one's own abilities and fear of failure. This condition is known as the quarter life crisis (Atwood and Scholtz, 2008). Resilience is an important aspect for individuals to overcome, improve themselves in facing various difficulties, challenges they experience. The purpose of this study was to determine the resilience picture of Bandung students who experienced a quarter life crisis. The study was conducted with quantitative descriptive methods. Samples were taken using purposive sampling technique with a total sampling of 421 Bandung students. The study used a resilience scale instrument of 25 items. The results showed the level of resilience of Bandung students who experienced a quarter life crisis showed that some of the respondents namely 56 people (13%) were at a very low level, 57 people (13.5%) were at a low level, 92 people (21.9% ) are below the average level, 112 people (26.6%) at the average level, 87 people (20.7%) at the above average level. Very few respondents were 17 people (4%) at a high level. The conclusion from this study is that the resilience of Bandung students experiencing quarter life crisis is at an average resilience level. Keywords: Resilience, quarter of life crisis, emergence of adults, Students. Abstrak. Masa dewasa muda merupakan sebuat tahapan perkembangan manusia. Memasuki tahap perkembangan dewasa, banyak reaksi yang muncul pada diri individu. Sebagian individu  merasa senang dan antusias, namun ada juga yang merasa cemas dan takut karena merasa tidak memiliki bekal atau persiapan yang cukup. Bentuk krisis emosional yang terjadi pada individu pada tahap emerging adulthood, mencakup perasaan tak berdaya, terisolasi, ragu akan kemampuan diri sendiri dan takut akan kegagalan. Kondisi ini dikenal dengan istilah quarter life crisis ( Atwood dan Scholtz, 2008).Resiliensi menjadi aspek penting bagi individu dalam mengatasi, meningkatkan diri dalam menghadapi berbagai kesulitan, tantangan yang dialaminya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui gambaran resiliensi mahasiswa Bandung yang mengalami quarter life crisis. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metoda deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel yang diambil menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan total sampling sebanyak 421 mahasiswa Bandung. Penelitian menggunakan instrumen resilience scale sebanyak 25 item. Hasil penelitian menunjukan tingkatan resiliensi mahasiswa Bandung yang mengalami quarter life crisis menunjukan bahwa sebagian dari responden yaitu 56 orang (13%) berada pada tingkat sangat rendah, 57 orang (13,5%) berada pada tingkat rendah, 92 orang (21,9%) berada pada tingkat dibawah rata-rata, 112 orang (26,6%) pada tingkat rata-rata, 87 orang (20,7%) pada tingkat diatas rata-rata. Sangat sedikit responden yaitu 17 orang (4%) pada tingkat tinggi. Simpulan dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa resiliensi mahasiswa Bandung yang mengalami quarter life crisis berada pada tingkat resiliensi rata-rata. Kata Kunci : Resiliensi, quarter life crisis, emerging adulthood, Mahasiswa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207