MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971949139 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x21501967

Modified general relativity and quantum theory in curved spacetime

2021· preprint· en· W2971949139 on OpenAlexaff
Gary Nash

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMathematical physicsSpacetimeDirac equationAntisymmetric tensorQuantum mechanicsGeneral relativityGauge theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With appropriate modifications, the multi-spin Klein–Gordon (KG) equation of quantum field theory can be adapted to curved space–time for spins 0, 1, 1/2. The associated particles in the microworld then move as a wave at all space–time coordinates. From the existence in a Lorentzian space–time of a line element field [Formula: see text], the spin-1 KG equation [Formula: see text] is derived from an action functional involving [Formula: see text] and its covariant derivative. The spin-0 KG equation and the KG equation of the outer product of a spin-1/2 Dirac spinor and its Hermitian conjugate are then constructed. Thus, [Formula: see text] acts as a fundamental quantum vector field. The symmetric part of the spin-1 KG equation, [Formula: see text], is the Lie derivative of the metric. That links the multi-spin KG equation to Modified General Relativity (MGR) through its energy–momentum tensor of the gravitational field. From the invariance of the action functionals under the diffeomorphism group Diff(M), which is not restricted to the Lorentz group, [Formula: see text] can instantaneously transmit information along [Formula: see text]. That establishes the concept of entanglement within a Lorentzian formalism. The respective local/nonlocal characteristics of MGR and quantum theory no longer present an insurmountable problem to unify the theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207