MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971955243 · doi:10.1136/oem-2019-epi.164

O7A.2 Gender, immigration status, and work disability for acute injuries

2019· article· en· W2971955243 on OpenAlexaffabout
Niloufar Saffari, Mieke Koehoorn, Kimberlyn McGrail, Chris McLeod

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational and Environmental Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPercentileMedicineDemographyContext (archaeology)Occupational safety and healthQuantile regressionConfoundingGerontologyGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The nature of work is changing rapidly with precarious work emerging as an occupational health issue. Both immigration status and gender are associated with precarious work and health inequalities. This paper investigated the modifying effect of gender on the relationship between immigration status and work disability duration for acute injuries in the Canadian context. Methods Workers in the Canadian jurisdiction of British Columbia with a workers’ compensation claim from 1995 to 2012 were linked to immigration data (n=8 83 830 claims), and categorized as recent (<10 years, 6.7%) or established immigrants (10+years, 4.0%), versus Canadian-born (89.3%). Work disability days one-year post-injury were modeled using quantile regression, adjusted for confounders and stratified by gender (29.6% women). The analyses was restricted to fractures (n=55 324 claims, 19.4% women), a ‘visible’ injury with a prescribed treatment trajectory within a public health care system. Results Disability duration for a work-related fracture was significantly longer for immigrant workers compared to Canadian–born workers regardless of immigration timing or gender, across the disability distribution: 7 to 10 days longer at the 25th percentile [e.g. recent immigrant women 10.4 [95% CI 5.6, 15.2] and men 8.9 days [6.8, 10.9]]; 12 to 15 days longer at the 50th percentile [e.g. recent immigrant women 15.3 [8.0, 22.7] and men 15.6 [12.5, 18.8]]; and 22 to 26 days longer at the 75th percentile [e.g. established immigrant women 22.5 [9.4, 35.8] and men 21.9 [13.4–30.3]]. Discussion Longer disabilities durations for fractures suggest that health inequalities and work vulnerabilities for immigrant workers are not readily explained by subjective injury characteristics or variability in clinical treatment guidelines. The current findings informed two research initiatives to investigate precarious employment on worker health, and to identity policy levers to mitigate inequalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational and Environmental MedicineSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207