MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972001137 · doi:10.2118/197070-pa

Low-Temperature Bitumen Recovery from Oil-Sand Reservoirs Using Ionic Liquids

2019· article· en· W2972001137 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Elsayed Abdelfatah, Paula Bertón, Robin D. Rogers, Steven L. Bryant

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAsphaltDissolutionSteam injectionPetroleum engineeringViscosityEnhanced oil recoveryOil sandsChemical engineeringMaterials scienceIonic liquidEnvironmental scienceChemistryGeologyComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Steam injection is widely used for bitumen recovery. However, steam is not efficient for shallow or thin reservoirs because of heat loss in the wellbore or to surrounding formations. Numerous alternatives have been proposed, including the addition of solvents and replacement of steam with volatile solvents. Here, we describe a new technology that combines nonvolatile ionic liquids (ILs) and waterflooding for bitumen recovery that can deliver high recovery at ambient temperature. Different ILs were designed for complete dispersal/dissolution of bitumen at ambient temperature. The designed ILs were tested in coreflood experiments with high–grade oil–sand ore from Alberta. Two different scenarios were tested: continuous injection of ILs at different injection rates and injection of a slug of ILs followed by water injection. Different slug volumes were tested at a constant injection rate. After ILs injection, the oil sand was removed from the column, and the remaining bitumen was quantified using a modified Dean–Stark method. Viscosity and solid–content measurements of the recovered samples at breakthrough were conducted. Bitumen recovery by the designed ILs can be thought of as a solution mining process. Tuning the physical and chemical properties of the ILs is the most important aspect of achieving the desired interaction with the oil–sand system. Properties of the designed IL depend on the selected cation and anion, and the strength of their intermolecular interaction. Primary amines mixed with the oleic acid chosen for IL1 form a viscous IL that can recover bitumen, leaving a slight amount of bitumen behind, but a large pressure gradient. Changing the cation to tertiary amines produces significantly less–viscous ILs, which completely recover the bitumen in the oil–sand column. Moreover, the cation can be tailored to significantly minimize the fines (clay) migration and viscosity of the recovered bitumen and to provide compatibility with an aqueous phase. In all cases, these recoveries are significant, compared with the currently used technologies. This work proves that bitumen recovery from oil sand is possible at low temperatures by means of a process analogous to solution mining with the design of the proper ILs, in contrast to viscosity–reduction processes achieved by thermal methods. The properties of these ILs can be tuned for different recovery mechanisms. Thus, this work establishes the basis for developing a new class of in–situ recovery processes with high recovery efficiencies and low environmental impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207