MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972063351 · doi:10.2450/2019.0053-19

Sex hormone intake in female blood donors: impact on haemolysis during cold storage and regulation of erythrocyte calcium influx by progesterone.

2019· article· en· W2972063351 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Fang, Kelsey Hazegh, Derek Sinchar, Yuelong Guo, Grier P. Page, Alan E. Mast, Steve Kleinman, Michael P. Busch, Tamir Kanias

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBlood donation and transfusion practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHaemolysisInternal medicineEndocrinologySex hormone-binding globulinMedicineHormoneImmunologyAndrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sex hormone intake in blood donors may affect the quality of red blood cell (RBC) products via modulation of RBC function and predisposition to haemolysis during cold storage. The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between female sex hormone intake and RBC storage outcomes, and to examine possible mechanisms by which sex hormones interact with RBCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sex hormone intake by race/ethnicity and menopausal status, and association analyses between hormone intake and donor scores of storage, osmotic or oxidative haemolysis, were evaluated in 6,636 female donors who participated in the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's RBC-Omics study. A calcium fluorophore, Fluo-3AM, was used to define RBC calcium influx in response to exogenous sex hormones or transient receptor potential cation (TRPC) channel drugs. RESULTS: Sex hormone intake was more prevalent in premenopausal women from all racial groups (18-31%) than in postmenopausal women (4-8%). Hormone intake was significantly (p<0.0001) associated with reduced storage haemolysis in all females, reduced osmotic haemolysis in postmenopausal donors (23.1±10.2% vs 26.8±12.0% in controls, p<0.001), and enhanced susceptibility to oxidative haemolysis in premenopausal women. In vitro, supraphysiological levels of progesterone (10 μmol/L), but not 17β-oestradiol or testosterone, inhibited calcium influx into RBC and was associated with lower spontaneous haemolysis after 30 days of cold storage (0.95±0.18% vs 1.85±0.35% in controls, p<0.0001) or in response to a TRPC6 activator. CONCLUSIONS: Sex hormone intake in female donors is associated with changes in RBC predisposition to haemolysis. Menstrual status and the type of hormone preparation may contribute to differences in haemolytic responses of female RBCs to osmotic and oxidative stress. Progesterone modulates calcium influx into RBC via a mechanism that may involve interactions with membrane TRPC6 channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBlood donation and transfusion practicesFrench-language works237,207