MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone: The OUTBACK TRIAL.

2012· article· en· W2972163358 on OpenAlexaffabout
Linda Mileshkin, Kailash Narayan, Kathleen N. Moore, Danny Rischin, Edward L. Trimble, Martin R. Stockler, Madeleine King, Ilka Kolodziej, Julie Martyn, Michael Friedländer, Michael Quinn, Shyam Kishore Shrivastava, William Small, Gillian Thomas, Peter Craighead, Val Gebski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical cancerCarboplatinRadiation therapyOncologyInternal medicineCancerRandomized controlled trialChemotherapyCisplatinClinical trialGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS5116 Background: Cervical cancer is a global health problem and the most common cause of cancer-related death among women in developing nations. Despite the recently developed cervical cancer vaccine, many women will continue to die from cervical cancer for many decades unless existing treatments can be improved. Unscreened women often present with locally-advanced disease that has a 5 year overall survival (OS) rate of 60% or less following standard chemo-radiation. Although some evidence suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy following chemo-radiation may be of value, its role remains controversial. Methods: OUTBACK is a randomized phase III Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) trial designed and led by the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG) in collaboration with the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre. Participating countries (groups) include Australia and New Zealand (ANZGOG), India, the USA and Canada (GOG, RTOG). OUTBACK is suitable for women with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB1 and node positive, IB2, II, IIIB or IVA). The primary objective is to determine if the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to standard cisplatin-based chemo-radiation improves OS. Women are randomized to either A) standard cisplatin-based chemo-radiation or B) standard cisplatin-based chemo-radiation followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Secondary objectives are to compare progression-free survival, treatment-related toxicity, patterns of disease recurrence, quality of life and psycho-sexual health, and the association between radiation protocol compliance and outcomes. Blood and tumour samples are collected from consenting patients for future translational studies. 780 women will be enrolled to determine if the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the 5-year OS rate by ≥ 10%. OUTBACK opened in Australia and New Zealand in 2011. In early 2012 the trial opened in the USA and activation of GOG sites is ongoing. 15 patients have been randomized. It is expected that RTOG and India will open the trial later this year with recruitment increasing substantially once all sites are activated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207