Incidence of vincristine induced neurotoxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its correlation with nutritional deficiencies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Injection vincristine is an important component of therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). An important adverse effect of vincristine is neurotoxicity. The incidence of this adverse effect is well studied. The present was undertaken to determine the incidence of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity in children with ALL after the induction of remission phase of chemotherapy and to ascertain its correlation with undernutrition, vitamin B12, folate and iron deficiency. Thirty children (1–18 years) with ALL were enrolled at the commencement of chemotherapy. The electrophysiological evaluation was done at baseline and repeated after four doses of vincristine (1.5 mg/m2/dose). Clinical evaluation was done regularly. Anthropometry and serum B12, folate and ferritin levels were assessed at baseline. Twelve children over a 4-week period of observation had peripheral neuropathy clinically. The autonomic system was most commonly involved followed by motor and sensory system respectively. On electrophysiological testing, half of the patients had evidence of neuropathy. Micronutrient deficiencies were present in a significant number of patients—63.3% had a B12 deficiency, 20% were deficient in folate and 43.3% in iron. The incidence of vincristine-induced neuropathy in patients with/without these micro-nutrient deficiencies was not statistically significantly different. Vincristine-induced neuropathy is common in Indian children with ALL. The present study did not find any correlation between the occurrences of vincristine-induced neuropathy and nutritional deficiencies. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the contribution of micronutrient deficiencies to the development of peripheral neuropathy in childhood ALL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".