MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972363742 · doi:10.3390/en12183485

Denoising of Radio Frequency Partial Discharge Signals Using Artificial Neural Network

2019· article· en· W2972363742 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Abbas Soltani, Ayman El‐Hag

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise reductionPartial dischargeRadio frequencyArtificial neural networkThresholdingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceNoise (video)WaveletEnergy (signal processing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Electronic engineeringVoltageEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most promising techniques for condition monitoring of high voltage equipment insulation is partial discharge (PD) measurement using radio frequency (RF) antenna. Nevertheless, the accuracy of monitoring, classification, localization, or lifetime estimation could be negatively affected due to the interferences and noises measured simultaneously and contaminate the RF signals. Therefore, to achieve high accuracy of PD assessment, exploiting the denoising algorithms is inevitable. Hence, this paper seeks to introduce a new technique to suppress white noise, the most prevalent type of noise, especially for RF signals. In the proposed method, the ability of artificial neural network (ANN) in curve fitting is applied to denoising of different types of measured RF signals emitted from PD sources including ‘crack’, ‘internal void’, in the insulator discs and ‘sharp points’ from external hardware. The processes of denoising for named signals with the proposed method are carried out, and the obtained results are compared with the outputs of a wavelet transform-based method named energy conversation-based thresholding. In all tested signals, the proposed technique showed superior denoising capability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207