Denoising of Radio Frequency Partial Discharge Signals Using Artificial Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most promising techniques for condition monitoring of high voltage equipment insulation is partial discharge (PD) measurement using radio frequency (RF) antenna. Nevertheless, the accuracy of monitoring, classification, localization, or lifetime estimation could be negatively affected due to the interferences and noises measured simultaneously and contaminate the RF signals. Therefore, to achieve high accuracy of PD assessment, exploiting the denoising algorithms is inevitable. Hence, this paper seeks to introduce a new technique to suppress white noise, the most prevalent type of noise, especially for RF signals. In the proposed method, the ability of artificial neural network (ANN) in curve fitting is applied to denoising of different types of measured RF signals emitted from PD sources including ‘crack’, ‘internal void’, in the insulator discs and ‘sharp points’ from external hardware. The processes of denoising for named signals with the proposed method are carried out, and the obtained results are compared with the outputs of a wavelet transform-based method named energy conversation-based thresholding. In all tested signals, the proposed technique showed superior denoising capability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".