Characterization of the Ontogeny of Hepatic UDP‐Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes Based on Glucuronidation Activity Measured in Human Liver Microsomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An understanding of the postnatal development of hepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes is required for accurate prediction of the age-dependent changes in pharmacokinetics of many drugs used in children. However, the maturation rate of hepatic UGT isoforms remains a major knowledge gap. This study aimed to establish the age-associated changes in glucuronidation activity of 10 major hepatic UGT isoforms in humans, namely, UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17. Human liver microsomes from pediatric and adult donors were incubated under optimized incubation conditions to assess the activity rates of hepatic UGT isoforms using a panel of 19 in vitro UGT probe substrates and clinically used drugs. Statistically strong correlations of glucuronidation activities allowed the ontogeny of UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15 to be established using multiple selective UGT substrates and matched human liver microsome samples. The postnatal development of hepatic UGTs is isoform-dependent using either individual or cross-correlated selective isoform substrates. Maximal adult activity was reached at different times ranging from within a month (UGT1A1, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15), during infancy (UGT1A3, UGT1A4, and UGT1A9), to adolescence (UGT1A6 and UGT2B17). This study provides an extensive characterization of the postnatal ontogeny profiles of hepatic UGT enzymes that are instrumental for predicting drug disposition via in vitro-in vivo extrapolation algorithms and verifying pharmacokinetic predictions against in vivo observations via pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in pediatric patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".