MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972409833 · doi:10.31518/2618-9100-2019-4-1

Economic Demography of the Colonial Era of North America

2019· article· en· W2972409833 on OpenAlex
Е.П. Макаров

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Courier · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussia and Soviet political economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismHuman settlementPopulationIndependence (probability theory)White (mutation)Settlement (finance)ColonizationCapital (architecture)GeographyEthnologyEconomic historyHistoryEconomyPolitical scienceDemographySociologyArchaeologyEconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first British settlements in America were founded in 1607, almost 170 years before the signing of the declarations of US independence. As usual, it is believed that the need for labor resources and capital in the new land, and as a result in our economy, allowed the white population to quickly achieve a high standard of living. However, over time, the colonial life did not show a significant improvement in the quality of life of the settlers. The resource abundance factor plays an important role in the formation of colonial institutions, encourages the white population to strive for the development of production, is based on slave labor and the formation of local governments. Most colonists are satisfied with the form of relations with the metropolis, but after 1763 changes in colonial policy led to increased tensions in the relationship between the colony and the UK. The article is devoted to the economic demography of the North American colonies, which in 1776 became the United States. During the 17 th -18 th centuries. Britain established the largest number of colonies in North and South America, including parts of the Canadian coast and West Indies. In the same period, other European states were also involved in the process of colonization of North America. The Spain founded settlements in southwestern Florida, France mastered Quebec, and until the 1660s. The Netherlands controlled areas that would later become part of the states of New York and New Jersey. Focusing on the process of European colonization of the region leaves aside the experience of indigenous peoples who had mastered North America for thousands of years before the arrival of European pioneers. For these groups, European colonization turned out to be a destructive process. Outbreaks of European diseases, such as smallpox, quickly destroyed the local population, and the diseases themselves were brought to the continent from the time of European fishing expeditions, even before permanent settlements of Europeans were founded. When the Europeans began to establish the first settlements, they encountered the native inhabitants of these places, and the constant influx of colonists found less and less resistance, which allowed them to occupy territories liberated by Indian tribes retreating deep into the continent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it