MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972497491 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12250

A Retrospective Study of the Association between Pain Intensity and Opioid Use with Length of Stay during Musculoskeletal Inpatient Rehabilitation after Primary Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

2019· article· en· W2972497491 on OpenAlexaff
Bhupinder Sahota, Mohammad Alavinia, Dinesh Kumbhare, Harpreet Sangha, John Flannery, Andrea D Furlan

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRehabilitationPhysical therapyArthroplastyComorbidityConfoundingOpioidRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The relationship between pain intensity, opioid consumption, and length of stay (LOS) has received little attention in primary, lower extremity joint arthroplasty patients admitted to inpatient musculoskeletal rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To assess how initial pain and other clinical factors are associated with rehabilitation LOS. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety nine patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not Applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensities on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were completed 3 times daily and total daily opioid consumption recorded in terms of morphine equivalents (MEQ). Confounding variables included patient demographics, medical comorbidity burden using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and early functional status as measured by the motor subscale from the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). RESULTS: Mean day 3 NRS values of ≥5.2 and total day 3 opioid consumption of >50 MEQ were associated with a prolonged LOS by nearly 3 and 2 days, respectively. Within a multivariate linear regression, age, mean day 3 pain, comorbidity burden, and early motor functional status accounted for 36% of the variability seen in joint replacement rehabilitation LOS. With all other variables remaining constant, for every unit increase in mean day 3 pain and CCI, this amounted to an additional 5% and 4% increase to LOS, whereas each unit increase in admission motor FIM decreased estimated LOS by 3%. CONCLUSION: Mean pain intensity and total opioid consumption on day 3 of inpatient rehabilitation is associated with LOS. For the rehabilitation physician, this is useful information as the earlier identification of patients with poorly controlled pain can lead to directed intervention, better patient care, and significant cost savings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFrench-language works237,207