MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972541451 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2019.01.0008

Sulfur Species Formed in the Seed Row of Sulfur‐Fertilized Soils as Revealed by K‐Edge X‐ray Absorption Near‐Edge Structure Spectroscopy

2019· article· en· W2972541451 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gourango Kar, J.J. Schoenau, Adam Gillespie, Gurbir Singh Dhillon, Derek Peak

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Research Council CanadaWestern Economic Diversification CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersWestern Grains Research FoundationSaskatchewan Canola Development CommissionUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsSulfurChemistryFertilizerAmmonium sulfateGypsumSoil waterThiosulfateSulfateChernozemXANESAmmoniumAgronomyInorganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistrySpectroscopySoil scienceMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Knowledge of the S fertilizer reaction products is important for understanding the behavior and efficacy of S fertilizers in soils. Sulfur K‐edge X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure spectroscopy is a useful tool for identifying the soil S species formed following application of different fertilizer forms under field conditions. Knowledge of S fertilizer reaction products following application is needed to predict the ability of different fertilizer forms to provide sufficient plant‐available S to crops. K‐edge X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy and wet chemical analysis techniques were used to identify the soil S species formed week to months after fertilization in the field on Brown Chernozem and Black Chernozem soils in Saskatchewan, Canada. The S fertilizer forms were ammonium sulfate, liquid ammonium thiosulfate, gypsum, elemental S, and a zero‐S control treatment. Treatments were applied at seeding at 20 kg S ha −1 . Sulfur as ammonium sulfate, ammonium thiosulfate, and gypsum increased the extractable SO 4 –S in the seed row 1 wk after application; thereafter, it decreased through plant uptake and runoff. For all fertilizers, total S concentration in the seed row increased after application and decreased over time. The XANES results showed that the highly oxidized sulfate form of S was dominant (45–55%) in ammonium sulfate‐ and gypsum‐treated soils 1 wk following application. Thereafter, the proportion as sulfate decreased over time while the reduced and intermediate S forms increased. The proportion of reduced S was highest in the elemental S and ammonium thiosulfate treatments and the proportion in oxidized forms increased from Week 1 to Week 8. Overall, the highly oxidized fertilizer S forms applied (sulfates) transformed to intermediate and reduced S species via immobilization and reduction processes, whereas the highly reduced forms (e.g., elemental S) underwent some oxidation as reduced S decreased and highly oxidized sulfate increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicNitrogen and Sulfur Effects on BrassicaFrench-language works237,207