'rudan cudromach a ràdh / ann an cànan neo-chudromach': sgrìobhadh sa Ghàidhlig san latha an-diugh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aig deireadh an dàin aice 'ain-cianalas', their a' bhana-bhàrd Ghàidhlig Mona NicLeòid Wagner, 'uaireannan cha dèan e ciall / rudan cudromach a ràdh / ann an cànan neo-chudromach' (2015, 46). 'S e seo prìomh cheist an sgrùdaidh seo: dè as ciall dha a bhith a' sgrìobhadh anns a' Ghàidhlig – no ann am mion-chànan sam bith – san latha an-diugh? Ciamar a dhèiligear ri litreachas a bhios à àite anns 'an t-saoghal litreachasail' a bhios an-còmhnaidh 'iomallach', agus ri teagsaichean agus ùghdaran a dhiùltas an dùil ri bhith gan 'aithneachadh' le 'meadhan' litreachasail? A' toirt iomradh air obraichean teòiridheil mu dheidhinn 'litreachas an t-saoghail' (Apter 2013; Casanova 2009; Melas 2007), agus gu h-àraid air ro-ràdh Phàdraig MhicAoidh agus Niall O'Gallagher ann an Sùil air an t-Saoghal (2013), molaidh mi ìomhaigh MhicAoidh agus O'Gallagher de litreachas na Gàidhlig mar 'shruth, a' co-mheasgachadh ri sruthan agus aibhnichean eile' (2013, v) mar bhun-stèidh airson sgrùdaidh litreachasail air teagsaichean Gàidhlig. A' tòiseachadh leis a' bheachd seo, bheir mi sùil air dà dhàn, 'ain-cianalas' le Mona NicLeòid Wagner (2015) agus 'Aistriúcháin' le Gearóid Mac Lochlainn (1999), bàrd à Èirinn a Tuath, feuch an tèid na ceistean a thig a-mach às a' cho-theagsa seo a fhreagairt. Bidh Wagner agus Mac Lochlainn a' cur cuideam air aonaranachd a' bhàird am broinn mion-chànain, ach fhathast sgrìobhaidh an dithis aca an cuid bàrdachd ann an Gàidhlig na h-Alba agus na h-Èireann. Ciamar a dhiùltar an sraon a dh'ionnsaigh an uile-choitcheannais, agus dè tha an diùltadh seo a' ciallachadh? Mar sin, ciamar a bheir sinn cunntas air suidheachadh litreachas na Gàidhlig an-diugh, na ioma-fhillteachd agus na chontrarrachdan uile-gu-lèir?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".