MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972620239 · doi:10.1063/1.5115409

Diffusion and recombination of optically-injected carriers in a semiconductor wafer in 3-dimensions

2019· article· en· W2972620239 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Boyd, R. N. Kleiman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiffusionCarrier lifetimeFree carrier absorptionBeam (structure)Diffusion equationSemiconductorWaferOpticsWork (physics)ChemistryMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsSiliconThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we derive a general equation describing the transmission of a probe beam in a pump/probe experiment upon optical injection of carriers into a semiconductor. The pump/probe radial overlap equation generalizes previous pump/probe approaches by considering the pump and probe beam sizes relative to each other and to the diffusion length. The pump/probe equation leverages a powerful solution to the free-carrier density under optical injection that is also derived in this work. The free-carrier density solution extends the work of Luke and Cheng to 3-dimensions, incorporating the effects of radial diffusion in a plane parallel to the semiconductor surface. The pump/probe equation quantifies the magnitude of free-carrier absorption of a probe beam induced by free-carriers optically injected via a pump beam. We show that when the pump/probe beams are much smaller than the carrier diffusion length, radial diffusion effects dominate. Measurements in this regime can be used to uniquely and simultaneously determine both the effective carrier lifetime and the diffusion coefficient. The equation agrees well with experimental measurements using a recently developed single-beam pump/probe technique, which ensures a perfect overlap of the pump and probe beams. Based on this equation, measurement criteria are developed for accurate determination of carrier lifetime and to correct for the effects of radial diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207