MARK4 protein can explore the active-like conformations in its non-phosphorylated state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 4 (MARK4) is a Ser/Thr protein kinase, best known for its role in phosphorylating microtubule associated proteins, causing their detachment from microtubules. In the current study, the non-phosphorylated conformation of the activation loop was modeled in a structure representing the enzymatically inactive form of this protein, and its dynamics were evaluated through a 100 ns initial all-atom simulation, which was prolonged by another 2 μs. Although the activation loop was folding on itself and was leaning toward ATP site in the initial modeled structure, soon after the initiating the simulation, this loop stretched away from the ATP binding site and stably settled in its new position for the rest of simulation time. A network of hydrogen bonds, mainly between the activation segment residues, αC-helix and the catalytic loop reinforced this conformation. Interestingly, several features of active kinase conformation such as formation of R-spine, Glu106-Lys88 salt-bridge, and DFG-In motif were observed during a considerable number of trajectory frames. However, they were not sustainably established during the simulation time, except for the DFG-In motif. Consequently, this study introduces a stable conformation of the non-phosphorylated form of MARK4 protein with a partially stretched activation loop conformation as well as partial formation of R-spine, closely resembling the active kinase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".