MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2972918177 · doi:10.14288/1.0365277

Understanding dating violence mental health outcomes in adolescents : age discrepancy and suicidality

2018· article· en· W2972918177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather Gesner

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthPsychologyDating violenceDevelopmental psychologySuicide preventionPoison controlClinical psychologyPsychiatryMedicineMedical emergencyDomestic violence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Key mental health outcomes are associated with adolescent dating violence. In research examining adolescent dating violence and mental health outcomes, results vary between studies, and little research is from Canada. Current research seldom considers gender differences, and the link between dating violence and older romantic partners. This study investigated gender differences in mental health issues associated with past year dating violence among youth in British Columbia. I also analyzed the relationship between dating violence and age-discordant relationships (illegal older partner at first sex). Methods: I conducted an analysis using cross-sectional data from the 2013 BC Adolescent Health Survey (BC AHS; N=28,992). Measures included: past year suicidal ideation/attempts and self-harm behavior, past month extreme sadness and hopelessness, poor self-rated mental health, and self-reported post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression diagnoses. I examined the relationship between dating violence and these mental health outcomes separately by gender. I analyzed these same measures by age-discordant relationships among those with a dating violence history for both boys and girls together, and then separately by gender. Results: Among the 39% of youth who reported being in a relationship, 5.9% reported experiencing dating violence, with similar prevalence for boys (6.3%) and girls (5.5%). Adolescent dating violence was associated with all mental health outcomes. Girls reported more adverse mental health outcomes than boys. Youth with dating violence were also more likely to report an age-discordant first relationship, and they were more likely to report poor/fair mental health, PTSD, and suicidality versus those whose first sexual partner was not illegally older. Among those with both dating violence and age discordant relationship history, boys were more likely to report poor/fair mental health; girls were more likely to report PTSD. Discussion and Implications: More girls than boys showed unfavourable mental health outcomes associated with dating violence. Results support past research showing a strong association between an older first sexual partner, dating violence and adverse mental health outcomes. Nurses in mental health services should regularly screen for dating violence in adolescent romantic relationships, for both boys and girls, which may exacerbate mental health illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicIntimate Partner and Family Violence→French-language works237,207→