Sensitivity Analysis of Unsteady Corium Solidification in an Initially Emptied Horizontal Turbulent Pipe Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In a reactor core meltdown under postulated severe accidents, the molten material called corium could be ejected or relocated through existing vessel penetrations. There exists, however, a potential for plugging of melt flow due to its complete solidification providing the availability of an adequate heat sink. Simulations of the melt flow in a horizontal tube were carried out to conduct a sensitivity study on the effect of key parameters on the melt penetration distance and bulk temperature distribution of the corium. The Reynolds number was varied from 10,000 to 20,000, inlet temperature was varied from 2600 K to 3000 K, the corium thermal conductivity was varied from 10 W/m·K to 20 W/m·K, and the pipe diameter was varied from 0.0095 m to 0.019 m. In addition, a comparison was made with an analytical model based on a modified Epstein's model and a previous numerical model. The study provided insight into the lower bound, which was found to be 98 mm, and the upper bound was 258 mm when predicting the potential penetration length of corium in horizontal pipes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".