MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972975576 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8815059

Actuator fault detection and estimation for linear hyperbolic PDEs with Fredholm integrals

2019· article· en· W2972975576 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Xu, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Fault detection and isolationFault (geology)Linear systemComputer scienceMathematicsHyperbolic partial differential equationState observerPartial differential equationNonlinear systemMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the actuator detection and estimation problem for a class of linear first-order hyperbolic partial integral differential equation (PIDE) systems. Based on the fault detectability analysis, a Luenberger-type observer is employed to achieve fault detection. However, in the case of actuator fault occurrence, modified Luenberger-type observers are developed such that actuator fault estimation is achieved in the presence of actuator fault while the system state estimation is realized. In comparison to the existing filter-based methods for distributed parameter systems, in proposed method in this manuscript, it is not necessary to transform the plant into the observer canonical form. The advantage of the proposed method is its flexible extension to other linear distributed parameter systems including all Riesz-spectral systems, as well as higher order nonspectral hyperbolic PDE systems. In particular, the proposed method is applicable to stable or unstable plants since the corresponding observation error systems are always stable, and therefore faults as well as plant state can be adequately estimated. Finally, an illustrative example is present to verify theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207