MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973042904

Families' perspectives on access to primary healthcare services for relatives living with dementia in Manitoba

2019· dissertation· en· W2973042904 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isaac Oppong

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaPrimary careGerontologyPrimary health careHealth careMedicinePsychologyFamily medicinePolitical scienceDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study purports to find out from family members of persons living with dementia about primary healthcare services available, challenges faced by relatives living with dementia when accessing these services, and their responses on how to improve access to these services in Manitoba. A literature review was conducted to describe what other scholars have reported on this matter or field of study. The researcher adopted the social model of disability as the underlying concept for this study. As this model holds that social and attitudinal barriers affect persons living with disabilities, it is incumbent on society to provide all the essential accommodations for persons living with dementia to improve their health and well-being. This study employed a qualitative methodology with a case study design. Through a working relationship with the Alzheimer Society of Manitoba, eight people who had relatives living with dementia were interviewed. Ethical procedures were followed and approval was given by the Joint-Faculty Research Ethics Board (JFREB). A consent form was given to each of the study participants who voluntarily agreed to engage in this project to sign. Based on the information shared by the family members, a case study approach was used to write their stories. The findings revealed that relatives living with dementia used various forms of primary healthcare services and other services such as specialists, home care, nursing homes, and personal care home services. In addition, relatives living with dementia faced difficulties when using primary healthcare and other services. As a result, the family caregivers made suggestions to improve access to primary healthcare and other services. Themes were created in order to discuss the results of this study. The researcher gave some recommendations that could be used to tackle dementia care and support for persons living with dementia in Manitoba and across Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207