MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973047914

Reliable data from low-cost sensor networks

2018· dissertation· en· W2973047914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Georgia Miskell

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A challenge in air quality monitoring is adequately determining local-scale spatiotemporal concentration variability. Air quality monitoring networks are traditionally limited in spatial resolution by the cost and ongoing maintenance requirements. Recent developments in low-cost sensors have presented new opportunities for high spatiotemporal air quality networks. Devices are low-cost, can be portable, and may be used to capitalise on “Citizen Science” initiatives. However, whilst devices offer the potential to increase the spatiotemporal resolution of air quality networks, a trade-off is introduced, that between quality versus quantity of data collected. Significant uncertainties exist regarding whether data from low-cost devices are reliable, precise and accurate enough to be useful. Further, given that it is not feasible to calibrate large numbers of devices using traditional protocols, there is a question as to whether more cost-effective options exist. Finally, the value of low-cost networks in identifying local-scale variability not observed in traditional networks is yet to be confidently asserted. This thesis sets out to address these research gaps by exploiting network correlations to develop automated data management frameworks, to evaluate the importance of local siting impacts on sensor data, and to seek fresh insights about local-scale air quality processes. Two ambient gas pollutants, ground-level ozone and nitrogen dioxide, are examined. Results show that network correlations among measurement locations can be used to determine data reliability. The concept of a ‘proxy’ is introduced, that is, a reliable signal from an independent source with similar statistical relationships to the site under examination. The choice of proxy is critical. Surrounding land use similarity is successfully used for selecting suitable proxies. Low variability between devices mounted at the same site, along with similarities to nearby regulatory stations, supports the ability of sensor data from a typical citizen science location to measure reliable, network-relevant information. Empirical methods for data validation and local calibration are presented that do not need large training datasets and allow real-time analysis. Starting with a clear definition of a low-cost network purpose – here to extend the spatial coverage of a regulatory network and provide real-time, reliable information on local-scale air quality – it is shown how to construct appropriate network management strategies and data validation tools. These methods allow a small regulatory station network to verify data from a larger network of low-cost devices. High-density networks in this work record processes not evident in current networks. Land use regression (LUR) and rank correlation models are illustrated as means to explore local-scale spatiotemporal variation. Rank correlation complemented LUR results in identifying similar significant urban variables, here related to traffic, atmospheric chemistry and urban built environment variables. Work presented in this thesis addresses some current challenges in the changing air quality measurement “paradigm”. Low-cost gas sensor value is demonstrated using data from networks in two cities: Auckland, NZ, and Vancouver, BC. There are a number of relevant and useful results: low-cost sensor data can use relationships between measurement locations in the network to verify data reliability; smart data handling protocols can limit costs; dense networks can identify local-scale processes not observable in current networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchSpace (University of Auckland)Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207