MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973057176 · doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2019.08.003

Safety and Tolerability of Evening Ethanol Consumption and Bedtime Administration of Flibanserin in Healthy Premenopausal Female Subjects

2019· article· en· W2973057176 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. Millheiser, Anita H. Clayton, Sharon J. Parish, Sheryl A. Kingsberg, Noel N. Kim, James A. Simon

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH. Lundbeck A/SMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma CorporationAllerganShionogiSage TherapeuticsUniversiteit StellenboschSanofiBayer HealthCareCovis PharmaJanssen PharmaceuticalsAMAG Austria MetallNew England Research InstitutesAcadia UniversityJapan Diabetes SocietyValeant Pharmaceuticals InternationalAbbVieRandom HouseAmgen
KeywordsEveningTolerabilityBedtimeMedicineHypoactive sexual desire disorderInternal medicinePsychologyEndocrinologyAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Flibanserin, a treatment for hypoactive sexual desire disorder, carries warnings for increased risk of severe hypotension and syncope when used with alcohol. However, these warnings are not informed by studies that used flibanserin's recommended bedtime dosing because previous alcohol studies assessed flibanserin's safety during the day. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ethanol in a real-world context in premenopausal women taking flibanserin at bedtime. METHODS: ) were dosed with flibanserin or placebo for 3 days to achieve steady-state plasma levels. In a clinical research unit, subjects (n = 22) were provided 2 units of wine (150 mL/unit; 12% ethanol content) or a nonalcoholic beverage with a standardized 3-course evening meal. Flibanserin 100 mg or placebo was administered at bedtime 2.5 hours after the end of the evening meal. On a separate day, subjects were provided the alternative beverage (± alcohol) with the same evening meal and dosed with the same treatment (flibanserin or placebo) at bedtime. After a 5-day washout period, subjects crossed over to the other treatment arm and the protocol was repeated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse events (AEs) and vital signs were monitored. RESULTS: In the absence of ethanol, headaches and hypotension were the only AEs that occurred in ≥2 subjects after flibanserin dosing (placebo corrected rates were 17.4% and 8.7%, respectively). After ethanol consumption, the rate of hypotension after flibanserin dosing was no greater than with flibanserin or placebo after nonalcoholic beverage consumption. There were no instances of orthostatic hypotension or syncope and no serious AEs or AEs leading to study discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Flibanserin dosed at bedtime after moderate amounts of alcohol with an evening meal was well-tolerated with no evidence of clinically significant hypotension or syncope. Millheiser L, Clayton AH, Parish SJ, et al. Safety and Tolerability of Evening Ethanol Consumption and Bedtime Administration of Flibanserin in Healthy Premenopausal Female Subjects. Sex Med 2019;7:418-424.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207