The Kilmar Magnesite Deposits: Evaporitic Metasediments in the Grenville Supergroup, Morin Terrane, Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesoproterozoic magnesite deposits are found associated with dolomitic marble and intercalated with metasedimentary rocks of the Grenville Supergroup in the granulite facies Morin terrane (Grenville Province, Quebec). This study examines one of the remaining ore deposits exposed on the surface (at the Dobbie mine), and presents stable isotope and mineralogical data for a marine evaporitic origin. The magnesite ore zone has δ18O(Mag) = 25.5 ± 0.4‰ (VSMOW) and δ13C(Mag) = 1.7 ± 0.2‰ (VPDB; n = 7), while surrounding dolomitic marble has δ18O(Dol) = 24.2 ± 0.6‰ and δ13C(Dol) = −0.2 ± 0.7‰ (n = 11). These values are at the high end of the range for other Morin terrane marbles, and this and sharp transitions in stable isotope ratios between lithologies argue for preservation of evaporitic enrichment in δ18O and δ13C. Boron isotope ratios (δ11B = 15.5‰ to 22.7‰) are also consistent with a marine evaporite origin. Identifying evaporitic protoliths in metasedimentary rocks is important for determining pre-metamorphic depositional environments, and in this case links the sedimentary setting of the Morin terrane to the Adirondack Lowlands (New York, NY, USA). The identification of the Kilmar magnesite deposits as evaporitic also has implications for the formation of sedimentary exhalative base metal deposits in the Grenville Supergroup.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".