Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis examines the association of science and musical thought that surrounded the Anglophone reception of the West German publication die Reihe (German publication: 1955 – 1962; English edition: 1957 – 1968). While die Reihe presented the early writings of what would become some of the central figures in European compositional circles, the journal’s initial reception was damned through the association of writings of die Reihe with pseudoscience, therefore suggesting that the work was false and to be dismissed. In order to examine the various roles of scientific thought and processes in die Reihe three central areas are explored: to what extent can the epistemological stance of scientism account for the science-like content of the journal? Can a musical journal be considered as a work of pseudoscience? And how did the journal’s portrayal of the composer Anton Webern assist in codifying the musical practices of the authors with the processes and structures of scientific work? It can be seen that scientism can permeate thought and society in multiple and discreet ways, and that scientism can be seen to have influenced policy-makers in post-Second World War West Germany by encouraging a wider application of scientific ideas than had been seen previously. In the same way, the rhetoric of die Reihe’s chief editor, Herbert Eimert, indicates an epistemological stance that is consistent with scientistic values. The initial reception that accused die Reihe of being a work of pseudoscience is critically examined, and it is found that there is insufficient justification for the journal to be considered a work of pseudoscience, because that while it bears a superficial similarity with scientific writing, die Reihe is not itself engaged with scientific work. Finally, it is seen that the way in which Webern’s work and legacy is depicted in the journal is quite unlike how Webern’s work was actually conceived, and as such the framing of Webern as a proto-scientistic composer is another indication of scientism in the thought of die Reihe’s contributors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".