Factors Influencing Community Satisfaction in Rural South Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Community satisfaction has important implications for individuals and communities because it can influence a person’s quality of life and overall well-being. The study aimed to identify the socioeconomic and community participation-related factors influencing residents’ satisfaction with their community in rural South Korea. Data were collected from 375 residents of 38 rural villages in Chungnam Province through structured questionnaires. The results from the hierarchical regression analysis showed that residents with higher annual income were more likely to be satisfied with their community. Moreover, participation in new generation cooperatives, community development organizations, and hobby organizations were positively associated with the satisfaction of residents with their community. On the contrary, residents with leadership experience in their community were less likely to be satisfied with their community life. Policy implications were also drawn from the study. Keywords: community satisfaction, community participation, hierarchical regression _______________________________________ Facteurs influant sur la satisfaction de la communauté rurale en Corée du Sud Résumé La satisfaction de la communauté a des implications importantes pour les individus et les communautés car elle peut influencer la qualité de vie et le bien-être général d'une personne. L'étude visait à identifier la participation socioéconomique et communautaire, facteurs connexes influençant la satisfaction des résidents à l'égard de leur communauté dans les zones rurales de la Corée du Sud. Les données ont été collectées auprès de 375 habitants de 38 villages ruraux de la province de Chungnam via des questionnaires structurés. Les résultats de l'analyse de régression hiérarchique ont montré que les résidents ayant un revenu annuel plus élevé étaient plus susceptibles d'être satisfaits de leur communauté. De plus, la participation à des coopératives de nouvelle génération, à des organismes de développement communautaire et à des organismes de loisirs était positivement associée à la satisfaction des résidents envers leur communauté. Au contraire, les résidents ayant une expérience de leadership dans leur communauté étaient moins susceptibles d'être satisfaits de leur vie communautaire. Les implications politiques ont également été tirées de l'étude. Mots-clés : satisfaction de la communauté, participation de la communauté, régression hiérarchique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".