Factors Influencing Community Satisfaction in Rural South Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Community satisfaction has important implications for individuals and communities because it can influence a person’s quality of life and overall well-being. The study aimed to identify the socioeconomic and community participation-related factors influencing residents’ satisfaction with their community in rural South Korea. Data were collected from 375 residents of 38 rural villages in Chungnam Province through structured questionnaires. The results from the hierarchical regression analysis showed that residents with higher annual income were more likely to be satisfied with their community. Moreover, participation in new generation cooperatives, community development organizations, and hobby organizations were positively associated with the satisfaction of residents with their community. On the contrary, residents with leadership experience in their community were less likely to be satisfied with their community life. Policy implications were also drawn from the study. Keywords: community satisfaction, community participation, hierarchical regression _______________________________________ Facteurs influant sur la satisfaction de la communaute rurale en Coree du Sud Resume La satisfaction de la communaute a des implications importantes pour les individus et les communautes car elle peut influencer la qualite de vie et le bien-etre general d'une personne. L'etude visait a identifier la participation socioeconomique et communautaire, facteurs connexes influencant la satisfaction des residents a l'egard de leur communaute dans les zones rurales de la Coree du Sud. Les donnees ont ete collectees aupres de 375 habitants de 38 villages ruraux de la province de Chungnam via des questionnaires structures. Les resultats de l'analyse de regression hierarchique ont montre que les residents ayant un revenu annuel plus eleve etaient plus susceptibles d'etre satisfaits de leur communaute. De plus, la participation a des cooperatives de nouvelle generation, a des organismes de developpement communautaire et a des organismes de loisirs etait positivement associee a la satisfaction des residents envers leur communaute. Au contraire, les residents ayant une experience de leadership dans leur communaute etaient moins susceptibles d'etre satisfaits de leur vie communautaire. Les implications politiques ont egalement ete tirees de l'etude. Mots-cles : satisfaction de la communaute, participation de la communaute, regression hierarchique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".