MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ottawa Ankle Rule: An Indian Perspective

2015· article· en· W2973127127 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dharmendra Kumar, Sudhir Singh, Alok Kumar Yadav

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkleOrthopedic surgeryRadiographyPhysical examinationEmergency departmentFoot (prosody)Presentation (obstetrics)SurgeryPhysical therapyGeneral surgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Foot and ankle injuries are common clinical conditions treated by orthopedic surgeons accounting for 6 to 12% of the patients seen in emergency. Currently, almost all patients with foot and ankle injuries undergo radiographic examination to exclude fractures; however, fewer than 15% of these patients actually have fractures, thus, most of these radiographs are unnecessary. Unwarranted radiographic examination increases the demands on the healthcare system and also results in prolonged patient waiting times. Ottawa ankle rule (OAR) evolved to reduce the number of radiography and waiting time for patients in emergency department by excluding fractures using only clinical examination. Although, it has good sensitivity but it has not been much popular and not included in medical curriculum. Aim The aim of the study is to implement the OAR in an Indian tertiary care trauma setup with two different levels of clinical examiners (1st year postgraduate junior resident and senior resident) and report the finding. Materials and methods This prospective study was done in the Department of Orthopedics, for a period of 15 months. Clinical examiners were shown and given a video presentation about the Oar and a printed copy of the rules were provided to all. Clinical diagnosis of both levels of clinical examiners were evaluated and analyzed. Results Three hundred cases met our inclusion criteria. In first clinical examination done by junior resident, 115 clinically significant fractures were suspected while senior resident suspected 69 fractures. Radiography showed 5 cases with missed fractures. Accuracy of OAR by JR is 82.33% and by SR is 97.0%. Conclusion Ottawa ankle rule are very effective and can identify all clinically relevant fractures of ankle and foot with increased accuracy and sensitivity when applied by a trauma specialists. Although, these rules can also be applied by general doctors so as to help them to screen patients who need radiography in acute ankle injury, but it is more sensitive when it is applied by specialist doctor. How to cite this article Singh S, Kumar D, Yadav AK. Ottawa Ankle Rule: An Indian Perspective. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia- Pacific) 2015;2(1):8-12.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)Same topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207