MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973150830 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8814593

Adaptive Estimation of Threshold Parameters for a Prandtl-Ishlinskii Hysteresis Operator

2019· article· en· W2973150830 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Al Janaideh, Xiaobo Tan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperator (biology)Control theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemMathematicsSuperposition principleInverseComputer scienceApplied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI) operator has been used widely in the modeling and inverse compensation of hysteresis nonlinearity in actuators made of smart materials, such as piezoelectric and magnetostrictive materials. A PI operator consists of weighted superposition of play operators, each of which is characterized by a threshold (also known as radius) parameter that determines the width of the corresponding hysteresis loop. While much work has been reported in identifying the weight parameters for the play operators, the threshold parameters have typically been assigned a priori in an arbitrary fashion. In this paper, for the first time, an adaptive algorithm is proposed for estimating online the unknown thresholds of a PI operator. The key challenge is that the output of the PI operator depends on the play thresholds in a complex, nonlinear, and time-varying manner. To address this challenge, the proposed algorithm utilizes the instantaneous slope of the input-output graph of the PI operator to infer the operating regime of each play, based on which a modified estimation error function is derived that is proportional to the error of threshold parameters. It is further shown, under a mild condition on the input, the regressor vector is persistently exciting and a gradient algorithm (with parameter projection) results in parameter convergence. The approach is illustrated in detail with a two-play PI operator, along with the results for the general case of n-play operators. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207