MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973174815

表情を伴う視線による反射的視覚定位とアレキシサイミア傾向の影響 : 日本語版TAS-20を用いた検討

2018· article· ja· W2973174815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
幸樹 辻

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alexithymia is a personality trait characterized by difficulties in both identifying and verbally describing one's own emotional state, experiences, and externally oriented thinking. Although the core problem of alexithymia is thought to be deficits in the perception and recognition of internal psychological and somatic states, many studies have shown the presence of deficits in the recognition of external emotional stimuli with negative valence, especially others' emotional facial expressions such as anger. The processing of facial expressions is combined with gaze direction as social signals. They play an important role in understanding others' attention, intentions, and emotional states. However, only a paucity of studies has been conducted on how emotional deficits in alexithymia affect social attention such as gaze-induced orienting. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to elucidate social attention in alexithymia by using a gaze-cueing paradigm based on Posner's endogenous attentional task. Forty-one participants completed the Japanese version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), which has three sub-scales, namely, difficulty identifying feeling (DIF), difficulty describing feeling (DDF), and externally oriented feeling (EOT). Participants in the top and bottom 15 of the total TAS and subscale scores were categorized as the high and low group of each scale. In the gazecueing paradigm, gaze cue with facial expressions depicting angry, fearful, and neutral emotions are presented as cue stimulus. The gaze-cueing effect was calculated as cue-target congruency, that is, the difference of the reaction time between congruent and incongruent conditions. Results showed that the high DIF group displayed a smaller gaze-cueing effect in the angry face condition compared to that of the low DIF group. The results suggest weak enhancement of attentional processing induced by emotionally arousing and socially relevant stimuli in individuals with high alexithymia. In the case of clinical alexithymia, those attentional and emotional characteristics might lead to maladaptive behavior in social situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207