MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973221449 · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105148

Twin growth discordance in association with maternal exposure to fine particulate matter and its chemical constituents during late pregnancy

2019· article· en· W2973221449 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Qiao, Yan Zhao, Jing Cai, Aaron van Donkelaar, Randall V. Martin, Hao Ying, Haidong Kan

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersShanghai Hospital Development CenterTongji UniversityShanghai Municipal Health BureauNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNatural Science Foundation of Shanghai
KeywordsParticulatesPregnancyEnvironmental chemistryTwin studyEnvironmental healthEnvironmental scienceMedicineChemistryBiologyGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twin growth discordance is one of the leading causes of perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies. Whether prenatal exposure to fine particle (PM2.5) air pollution is associated with twin growth discordance have not been studied yet. To evaluate the associations of prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and its chemical constituents with twin growth discordance. This study included 1917 twin pairs and their mothers drawn from a previous twin birth cohort at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant hospital in Shanghai, China. Exposure to PM2.5 total mass and 6 key chemical constituents during the whole pregnancy and each trimester of pregnancy was represented by satellite-based models. Maternal exposures to PM2.5 total mass and chemical constituents of sulfate (SO42−) and ammonium (NH4+) during the third trimester were significantly associated with increased within-pair birth weight difference and intertwin birth weight discordance. The within-pair birth weight difference increased by 30.6 g (β = 30.6, 95% CI, 4.4–56.9), 19.2 g (β = 19.2, 95% CI, 0.2–38.1) and 33.2 g (β = 33.2, 95% CI, 7.9–58.6) for an IQR increase in PM2.5 total mass, SO42− and NH4+ exposure, respectively. While the intertwin birth weight discordance increased by 1.3% (β = 1.3, 95% CI, 0.3–2.2), 0.9% (β = 0.9, 95% CI, 0.2–1.6) and 1.4% (β = 1.4, 95% CI, 0.4–2.3) for the same exposure metrics. Moreover, higher SO42− and NH4+ exposure was also associated with increased risk of twin growth discordance in linear dose-response manners. Compared to the lowest quartile of SO42− (OR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.08–5.82) and NH4+ (OR = 2.97, 95% CI, 1.16–7.58) exposure, the odds of twin growth discordance were doubled in highest quartile of exposure. Our results suggest that fine particle air pollution may be a risk factor for twin growth discordance. Late pregnancy seems to be a critical window for the effects of PM2.5 exposure on fetal growth in twins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment InternationalSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207