Stereoselective Synthesis of ( <i>R</i> )‐(( <i>R</i> )‐1‐Phenyl‐2,2,2‐Trichloroethyl)2‐(2‐Bromophenyl)aziridine‐1‐Carboxylate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This chapter article the procedure for synthesis of (R)‐((R)‐1‐phenyl‐2,2,2‐trichloroethyl)2‐(2‐bromophenyl)aziridine‐1‐carboxylate. It presents some of the important points to be considered, the conditions that need to be maintained, characterization data, and the reagents required, as well as the techniques used and the equipment setup that are vital to carrying out the process. Stereoselective aminations of alkenes and alkanes are achieved using namely metal nitrene species. The scope of the aziridination reaction includes styrene derivatives containing diversely functionalized aromatic ring as well as β‐methylstyrene. The cleavage of the (R)‐2,2,2‐trichloro‐1‐phenylethyl carbamate undergoes under basic reaction conditions, avoiding the concomitant opening of the aziridine moiety, that is typically observed for cleavage of sulfonyl‐protected aziridines. The article also describes the hazards associated with working with chemicals and the ways to deal with these hazards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".