MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973571486 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-116322

Pediatric Reference Intervals for the DxH 520* Hematology Analyzer

2018· article· en· W2973571486 on OpenAlexaff
Astrid Smit, Aprille Lynn Seidel, Justin Rohrbach, Robert Magari, Karen K. Lo, J.A.Sanchez Martin, Khosrow Adeli, Victoria Higgins, Meer‐Taher Shabani‐Rad, Maureen Cyfra, Tracey Gwilliam, Wendy K. Michaud, Brian Tuson, Kristy Schmitt, Nicole Couvrette, Sandra Axelson, Liliana Tejidor

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean corpuscular volumeMedicineRed blood cell distribution widthHematocritMean corpuscular hemoglobin concentrationMean corpuscular hemoglobinHematology analyzerComplete blood countHematologyWhite blood cellInternal medicineGastroenterologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The DxH 520 is a small hematology analyzer capable of performing CBC and 5-part differential in fresh whole blood samples (venous and capillary) collected in K2EDTA and K3EDTA anticoagulants. Medical care of children and adolescents is significantly dependent on reference intervals to properly interpret laboratory test results. A multi-center study was performed to verify or establish pediatric reference intervals for all parameters (White Blood Cells (WBC), Red Blood Cells (RBC), Hemoglobin (Hgb), Hematocrit (Hct), Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW), RDW-SD, Platelets (PLT), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), (Lymphocyte) LY%, LY#, Monocyte% (MO%), MO#, Neutrophil % (NE%), NE#, Eosinophil% (EO%), EO#, Basophil % (BA%), and BA#) with combined genders. Methods: Whole blood samples from healthy children were tested within 8 hours of collection on the DxH 520 analyzer. Samples generating review flags or suspect messages were excluded from the analyses. Even gender distribution was targeted. A total of 208 specimens were enrolled that included 20 neonates (0 to 30 days), 27 infants (31 days to 2 years), 94 children (3 to 12 years) and 67 adolescents (13 to 21 years). Results were analyzed according to CLSI EP20-A3c guidelines. Results: Reference intervals for the neonate age group were verified from existing published ranges using the transference method described in the guideline (Table 1). The robust method was used to calculate two sets of reference intervals partitioned by combining data from the infant and children age groups, and from the adolescent age group (Table 2). Conclusion: Reference Intervals for CBC and differential parameters have been established for pediatric age groups (0 to 30 days, 31days to 12 years, 13 to 21 years) on the DxH 520 Hematology analyzer. *CE marked. Pending 510(k) clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration; not yet available for in vitro diagnostic use in the U.S. Beckman Coulter, the stylized logo, and the Beckman Coulter product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Disclosures Smit: Beckman Coulter: Employment. Seidel:Beckman Coulter: Employment. Rohrbach:Beckman Coulter: Employment. Magari:Beckman Coulter: Employment. Lo:Beckman Coulter: Employment. Martin:Beckman Coulter: Employment. Tejidor:Beckman Coulter: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207