MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstracts from The 35 <sup>th</sup> Annual National Neurotrauma Symposium July 7–12, 2017 Snowbird, Utah

2017· article· en· W2973670627 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher S. Ahuja, Mohammad Rasool Khazaei, Sara Baig, Jainetri Merchant, Priscilla Chan, Michael G. Fehlings, Ahmed Alshareef, J. Sebastian Giudice, Jason Forman, Matthew B. Panzer, Jake Godzik, Jay F. Dalton, Rohit Mauria, Kristina Chapple, Alan Cook, Jay D. Turner, Nicholas S. Guzowski, Michael McCrea, Lindsay D. Nelson, Matthew A. Hemphill, Shanti R. Tummala, David F. Meaney, Ryan Hirschi, Gregory W. J. Hawryluk, Jessica L. Nielson, J. Russell Huie, Lara Zimmermann, Rajiv Saigal, Quan Ding, Adam R. Ferguson, Geoffrey T. Manley, Stephanie J. Lee, Shyam Gajavelli, Markus S. Spurlock, Karla N. Rivera, Cody Androni, Juan Pablo de Rivero Vaccari, Robert W. Keane, Ross Bulock, W. Dalton Dietrich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeUniversity of PennsylvaniaBrain Injury Research CenterNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNFL Charities
KeywordsChondroitin sulfate proteoglycanNeural stem cellRegeneration (biology)Spinal cord injuryNeuriteNeuroscienceGlial scarMedicineInduced pluripotent stem cellStem cellSpinal cordBiologyChondroitin sulfateCell biologyAnatomyIn vitroEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells (hiPS-NSCs) represent an exciting therapeutic strategy for traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) as they can replace lost neural circuits, remyelinate denuded axons and provide local trophic support.Unfortunately, most patients are in the chronic phase of their injuries where dense chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) scarring significantly impairs neurite outgrowth and regenerative cell migration.Several scarmodifying enzymes have been shown to synergistically enhance NSCmediated recovery, however, nonspecific intrathecal administration can produce off-target effects.We aimed to generate a geneticallyengineered line of hiPS-NSCs, termed Spinal Microenvironment Modifying and Regenerative Therapeutic (SMaRT) cells, uniquely capable of expressing a scar-modifying enzyme within the host environment to enhance functional recovery.A proprietary enzyme was non-virally integrated into hiPS-NSCs and a monocloncal line of SMaRT cells was generated and extensively characterized.The expressed enzyme rapidly degrades CSPGs on biochemical assays and allows neurons to extend into CSPG-rich regions in vitro.Furthermore, unlike wild-type hiPS-NSC media, conditioned SMaRT cell media can degrade post-injury rodent CSPGs in ex vivo injured cord cryosections.T-cell deficient rats (N = 60) with translationallyrelevant chronic C6-7 clip-contusion injuries have been randomized to receive: (1) vehicle, (2) hiPS-NSCs, (3) SMaRT cells, or (4) sham surgery (laminectomy).While blinded sensorimotor behavioural assessments and rehabilitation are ongoing with a long-term 32-week endpoint, interim histologic analysis shows that grafted human cells are extending remarkably long ( ‡ 20,000 lm) axons along host white matter tracts in the rostral and caudal directions.This work provides exciting proof-of-concept data that genetically-engineered SMaRT cells can degrade CSPGs in vitro and that human NSC transplants can grow long axons in chronic cervical SCI to potentially form a bridge for sensorimotor signal transmission.This work is generously supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Phillip and Peggy DeZwirek, OIRM, and the Krembil Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4990.239

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurotraumaSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207