Clinical utility of echocardiography for the diagnosis of native valve infective endocarditis in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteremia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis (IE) is steadily rising due to advances in health care delivery. Routine echocardiography is essential in the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to characterize the real-world use of echocardiography in adult patients with SAB and native valve S aureus IE. METHODS: Using an academic hospital microbiological database, all cases of SAB in adults between 2010 and 2016 were identified. Demographic, echocardiographic, and clinical features were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 738 episodes of SAB were identified, of which 504 (68%) patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 30 days. Of 73 patients with definite IE, 46 (63%) patients had definite IE diagnosed on the initial TTE. An additional 14 (19%) patients had definite IE diagnosed on repeat TTE, 6 (8%) on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and 7 (10%) were diagnosed without fulfilling Duke echocardiographic criteria. The yield of repeat TTE was comparable to that of TEE for identifying new vegetations not identified on the initial TTE (17% vs 21%, P = .78). CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of IE in SAB were identified using TTE alone, with repeat TTE improving the diagnostic yield in the setting of clinical decompensation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".