MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973715300 · doi:10.1177/1203475419878161

<i>AAGAB</i> Mutations in 18 Canadian Families With Punctate Palmoplantar Keratoderma and a Possible Link to Cancer

2019· article· en· W2973715300 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Youssef Elhaji, Cherise Elizabeth Hedlin, Anu S. Nath, Emma L. Price, Christopher Gallant, Stacey A. Northgrave, Peter Hull

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Dermatology Foundation
KeywordsGeneticsKeratodermaGenodermatosisExonMedicineFamily historyMutationPalmoplantar keratodermaMalignancyCancerHyperkeratosisBiologyGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Punctate palmoplantar keratoderma type 1 (PPPK1) presents in late childhood to adulthood with multiple small discrete hyperkeratotic papules on palms and soles. PPPK1 is an autosomal dominant skin disease caused by AAGAB mutations. It has been suggested that PPPK1 may be associated with an increased predisposition to systemic malignancies. Objectives: To evaluate the presence of AAGAB mutations in Canadian families with PPPK1 and the possible increased predisposition to systemic malignancies. Methods: Eighteen unrelated Canadian families with PPPK1 were recruited for this study. Genomic DNA was extracted from saliva and PCR amplification was performed for all AAGAB exons and exon/intron junctions. PCR products were sequenced and analyzed for mutations. A family history of malignancy was obtained from the index case and, when possible, from other family members. Results: We have identified 5 heterozygous AAGAB loss of function mutations in 11 families. The mutation c.370 C&gt;T, p.Arg124* was the most prevalent and was identified in 6 families. A splice site mutation, c.451+3delAAGT, was identified in 2 families. The other mutations c.473delG, p.Gly158Glufs*0; c.550-551insAAT, p.Gly183*; and c.505-506 dupAA, p.Asn169Lysfs*6 were each identified in 1 family. Different cancers were reported in 11 families (Table 1 and Supplemental Figure S1). Conclusions: AAGAB mutations were found in 11 of 18 families with PPPK1. In some families there appears to be an association with cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207